|
TOEFL Directory > TOEFL writing > GMAT Issue Writing Sample 3
GMAT Issue Writing Sample 3
"Corporations and other businesses should try to eliminate the many ranks and salary grades that classify employees according to their experience and expertise. A 'flat?organizational structure is more likely to encourage collegiality and cooperation among employees.?
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the opinion stated above. Support your views with reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.
3. Which is a better way to classify and reward employees of a business: a "flat"
organizational structure or a hierarchical structure? The speaker prefers a "flat"
structure in which distinctions between employees based on education or experience are
not used as a basis for monetary rewards. I strongly disagree with the speaker's view,
for two reasons.
In the first place, the speaker's preference for a "flat" structure is based upon the
claim that cooperation and collegiality among employees is more likely under this
system than under a hierarchical one. However, this claim ignores our everyday
experience in human interaction. Disagreements among coworkers are inevitable.
Without a clear authoritative figure to resolve them and to make final decisions,
disputes are more likely to go unresolved and even worsen, thereby undermining
cooperation, congeniality and, ultimately, productivity and profit.
In the second place, whether or not collegiality and cooperation are best fostered
by a flat organizational structure is beside the point. My main reason for rejecting an
organizational structure that does not distinguish workers in terms of their abilities or
experience is that under such a system workers have little incentive to improve their
skills, accomplish their work-related goals, or assume responsibility for the completion
of their assigned tasks. In my experience, human motivation is such that without
enticements such as money, status or recognition, few people would accomplish
anything of value or assume responsibility for any task. A flat system actually might
provide a distinct disincentive for productivity and efficiency insofar as workers are not
held accountable for the quality or quantity of their work. By ignoring human nature,
then, a company may be harming itself by encouraging laziness and complacency.
In sum, the speaker's opinion that a "flat" organizational structure is the best way
to promote collegiality and cooperation among employees runs counter to the common
sense about how people act in a work environment, and in any case provides a feeble
rationale for the preference of one organizational structure over another.
|
